About case laws on partial partition of joint properties
About case laws on partial partition of joint properties
Blog Article
Online access to case information for payments in pick juvenile and domestic relations district courts. Cases can be searched using name, case number, or hearing date.
101 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject: Appeal At times it is easy for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to make an attempt to eliminate a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's reached to the stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it's got reached these types of stage. Read more
four. Record shows that the petitioner has been booked in as much as eight criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the instant case. Even though the petitioner has obtained bail in those cases, it does, prima facie, establish that the petitioner is prone to repeating the offence.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” aren't binding, but may very well be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance on the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August twenty eighth, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government agencies in regards to projects that could perhaps pose a public risk. This case can also be noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all long run public interest litigation brought before courts for environmental protection.” To cite only one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia more info decision, found during the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination is actually a right to life itself.
The issue here is that an accused might say that they meant to injure the sufferer, but they didn't plan to destroy them. In other words, they might claim that thedeath that resulted due to the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor supposed.
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based within the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may possibly find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Using keywords effectively is also vital. Consider using synonyms and variations of your keywords to make sure you seize all relevant results. Understanding the citation system used by Pakistani courts will also help you pinpoint specific cases.
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury into a person, by doing an act which from the ordinary course of nature is probably going to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently risky that it must in all probability cause death, causes the death with the this kind of person, is alleged to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition for the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Advancement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter being a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) from the Pakistan Constitution offers original jurisdiction for the Supreme Court to get up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are set up by executive organizations based on statutes.